Source: DigitalJournal.com
Once again, a new study has shown the differences in between excessive Internet use (EIU) from also Compulsive Internet use (CIU), which shows that both are not good for you at all.
Alot of research in the past has shown this already, which that data shows the difference in between undesirable psychological outcomes just like depression and also loneliness. Some experts are saying that different motivations to talk online has negative outcomes or consequences, as the Internet itself can for many people become a compulsive addiction.
CIU is referring to the inability to control, stop or even reduce their online behavior, where EIU is to the degree where someone feels that she or he is spending too much time online or even loses track of the time when using the Internet.
This lack of ability to control oneself(s) on the Internet could lead to depression, loneliness or even to avoiding face-to-face interaction with the individuals friends and family.
A newer study done by Joseph Mazer, Ph.D., on behalf of Clemson University and also Andrew M. Ledbetter, Ph.D., from the Texas Christian University studied how specific the online communication traits occur, such as someone?s tendency for self-disclosure online, social connections online, and also online anxiety ? which is predicted in their compulsive and also excessive Internet use and in return a consequence that usually occurs which is poor well-being.
You can find the information behind the study in the Southern Communication Journal.
Ledbetter and Mazer discovered that the likelyhood of someone to disclose themselves online and also social connections online would lead them into using the Internet more and more in compulsive ways. And also if a person has very poor face-to-face communication skills, that specific person will more likely be addicted to social features like online communication on the Internet, which adds to the fire of CIU.
More research is suggesting that individuals who are socially anxious (doesn?t that ring a bell?) turn to online communication as they believe that it is less socially threatening than the outside world.
Though the discoveries made from Ledbetter and Mazer and not purely outlined with this specific claim as they have discovered users that are compulsive that also experience anxiety when communicating online with other users.
The conflicts found with theory that is traditional, frames the online communication as a very safe activity for socially anxious people that like to escape their fears of anxiety in talking to people face-to-face.
Though, to that specific extent that the socially nervous and anxious are attracted to the Internet, it is said that anxiety seems to fuel the addictions, but not specifically to the excessive amount of Internet use.
But if you think about it again, the users that are excessively addicted seem to be having a more and more realistic perception of the communication online as more convenient though sometimes very limited in the effectiveness specifically for the lack of social cues that are usually only capable of being done in face-to-face, real-life conversations.
It is summarized by researchers in their findings showing that anxiety does specifically motivate Internet addictions in a compulsive manner, which the efficiency actually drives the excessive use of the Internet.
It was found by Mazer and Ledbetter that CIU, not EIU, made individuals experiences very poor well-being outcomes.
Some researchers are unsure if the use of social networking sites maintains social connections to influence the frequency of online communication, or of the fact of the possibility of how excessive the participation of these sites might integrate these sites into excessive and compulsive Internet usage.
Via Psych Central (originally from Clemson University)
encyclopedia britannica pi white lion mike d antoni resigns holes ncaa brackets 2012 odd
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.